Pick up others and throw it away. Now the owner finds me, do you want to lose money? did this matter. After picking up, there is obligation to keep.
The man picked up the diamond ring and threw it at hand, and then caused trouble
On January 21 this year, Ms. Zhu of Hangzhou (a pseudonym ) Lost a one -carat diamond ring and a gold ring. Coincidentally, the two rings were picked up by Mr. Wang (a pseudonym), and he was surveillance to take the ring. Unexpectedly, this loss and picked up brought trouble to both parties. The owner: You picked up the ring, or I would or lose my ring or lose my losses Yesterday afternoon, the Shangcheng Court opened the trial of the case. Ms. Zhu talked about the throwing diamond ring and choked a few times. She said that she was a gold ring and a diamond ring, which was of great significance to her. At more than 12 noon on the 21st, in order to wipe the hand cream, she took the two rings and put it on her body. At that time, she was sitting in the car. When she got out of the car, she forgot that the ring had not taken back, so after getting off the car, the ring fell in front of the cell one building. Please click Enter the picture description ▲ The two rings wearing Ms. Zhu's hand Buy 10,000. At about 1 pm, she found that the ring was lost and hurried back to find, but couldn't find it. After checking the monitoring, the police found that the two rings were picked up by Mr. Wang. "When I know who found it, I still want to thank him well." Ms. Zhu said that what I didn't expect was that Mr. Wang only returned a gold ring and said that he thought that the diamond ring was fake. Later, I lost it at the door of the express company. "I won't look at my rings. Whoever believes that he believes that he will throw it away. Even the police say that everyone knows that he refuses to return it." Ms. Zhu originally asked Wang Wang Wang Wang. Mr. Mr. Wang also repeatedly emphasized that the ring had been lost, and Ms. Zhu turned to ask Mr. Wang to compensate 77,000 yuan in losses. The case has also changed from the return of the original dispute to the dispute of property protection. The person: I did n’t have the obligation to help you keep it. I think the ring is a cheap product Mr. Wang naturally feels aggrieved. "Although I picked up the ring, I also have no obligation to help you help you help you help you help you help you. Keep it. "Mr. Wang said that he couldn't live in the community of Ms. Zhu. He just happened to go to the haircut. When he was waiting for a call, he saw two brilliant things on the ground. "I picked it up, a yellow ring, a stainless steel ring, I think this diamond ring is like aluminum alloy with a small glass in the middle. The money of money, because it looks very cheap. So when I was sending a courier on the East Road of Huancheng in the evening, I took it out and threw it away. "Mr. Wang said. Ms. Zhu asked him: "Why didn't you get the ring to the police room next to it? Since you feel worthless, why not throw it away on the spot?" When the phone was called, I took it in hand without throwing it away on the spot. And I ca n’t live here, I do n’t know that there is a police room next to it. Later, he sent express, and he remembered the ring when he pulled his pocket. At the same time, Mr. Wang pointed out that he suspected that Ms. Zhu sued himself, which was a scam. "When they came to take the ring, there was no gratitude. Several people asked me where they came up, and where the other ring was. She always said that the ring was very valuable, but she hadn't found it herself. Once, it is not in line with common sense. I also helped her go back to find it a few times, but this is not my matter, why should I care so much? " , Mr. Wang believes that Ms. Zhu only gave the ring that gave the ring’s ring. The sales order is not an invoice. This evidence does not have legal effect. Moreover, Ms. Zhu could not prove that the lost ring is the ring on the sales order. Mr. Wang said that he was also damaged by mental damage, and he reserved the right to counterclaim and pursuing mental loss. Sub -then, Ms. Zhu took out a photo of her own diamond ring to prove that the loss of the diamond ring is the diamond ring pointed to the sales order. However, after looking at the photo, Mr. Wang said that on the ring he picked up, the glass did not exceed the below bracket, and the diamond on the photo was beyond the bracket, so he thought it was not the same ring. Please click Enter the picture description Lawyers: Those who pick up things need to have the obligation to guarantee, and deliberately throw away the corresponding responsibility The lawyer Chen Shiyang of Zhongchen Law Firm in the south of Zhejiang pointed out that he is picking up After the loss of others, the person who picked up things had obligations. He gave things to the competent department. For example, taxi drivers handed the passengers to the transportation management department and completed their custody obligations. If the person who picks up things to lose others, it depends on what causes the loss. If it is caused by intentional or major negligence, it is because the person who picks up things does not fulfill his obligation and needs to bear the corresponding responsibilities. Otherwise, there is no need to bear responsibility. In this case, Mr. Wang also admitted that he had lost his ring. This belongs to the intentional loss of loss and did not fulfill the obligation of custody, so he needs to bear the corresponding compensation liability. Is how much money Mr. Wang should compensate, which first requires the owner of Ms. Zhu to prove the value of the ring. "Ms. Zhu can take out the purchase voucher, invoice or the shopping list issued by the mall, or the records that can provide card transactions at that time, not necessarily the invoice." Secondly, Ms. Zhu needs to prove that she lost her own objects and lost her objects. It is the same as the objects on the purchase voucher. "In this case, Mr. Wang proposed that the loss of objects and the shopping list is not the same item, and it makes sense, so this evidence is difficult." Attorney Chen introduced that the evidence of both parties cannot prove 100%of their claims. Both parties also refuse to mediate. The court will judge according to "height", that is, the judge will make a judgment based on who is more credible to see who is more credible. At the same time, Mr. Chen pointed out that if there is evidence to prove that the person who picks up things obviously keeps things, but he lies in the trial that things are lost. Fraud, the owner can report the case. The trial lasted for more than two hours, and the judge did not pronounce in court. The netizen comments @ms горох: Oh my god, this world. Obviously, the lady lost her herself and wanted to pass the economic losses to others, and she made money! Intersection I want to know, shouldn't she bear what she lost? For those who do not know grateful, it deserves something to lose. In the future, I saw that others did n’t see it, and the thief looked at him. He was still not paying it back ~ If the man was convicted of the man to compensate, Lei Feng would become less and less in the future. @mr. Xiaowe: It is best not to pick up things in the future, otherwise picking up a jar may be gold -plated, picking a toothpick may be ivory, and a glass ball may be crystal. The traffic police officer will say you are a fool, your brain is broken, throw it away, you may be sued in court for you to lose money. n@llily: It's also haha, this matter tells us a truth: Don't pick up the wild flowers on the roadside, don't pick it up on the roadside garbage. @This year: What is wrong with picking things and stealing things in this society? If you are alive, you have to be careful. If one day I dropped downstairs through the flowers upstairs and smashed me. I had to blame my head and broke his pot? @：: I think there are possibilities for scams. @ms горох: If the man is sentenced to losing money, the hunch will be developed and expanded ~ a hawker (you can invoice), give yourself a sky -high invoice, throw things on the camera with a camera, In the place, fishing is fine. Are there any friends who fish together? @: Now the glass ring of five dollars in the jewelry shop is really true. Anyway, I don't know the true or false. Last time my diamond ring was thrown in the unit, and my colleague thought it was fake, so I put it on the table. This lady should not blame others if she keeps it alone. Because there are more and more reports now, I dare not pick up when I see something outside, and I am afraid that I will take responsibility in the end. Last time I went out to play with my husband at night, and saw that there was a mobile phone on the roadside flower bed. I wanted to pick it up to see if I could find the owner. My husband said that there was a mobile phone that may be a scam. Essence @: Other people have the obligation to keep things be kept? Do you have to pay? Then he didn't keep his own things, why not lose himself? Do you want to pay for others? If you picked it up, you are noble, and you do n’t pay attention to it. This woman is an unreasonable Lord at first glance. Whoever loses things is not considering unlucky, you can find it and thank you, you ca n’t find or blame others. You do n’t keep your own things. Why should others keep you? This woman must have a relationship! Now in this society, his mother's unreasonable place! @草 ：: The owner wants money to crazy? Why do you make others take responsibility? It's ugly, don't you pick it up, right? It's funny ... @ WeChat Super Member : ring: blame me! @� � � � � � � � � � � � �, including garbage ... In case of story! @ : What does this show this incident? @仕-Huang Gang: Quoting the sentence of Secretary Sha: Do not let the honest people bleed and cry! Cold their hearts! . If: Do n’t pick it up on the roadside people. Please click Enter the picture description
Pick up others and throw it away. Now the owner finds me, do you want to lose money?
did this matter. After picking up, there is obligation to keep.
The man picked up the diamond ring and threw it at hand, and then caused trouble
On January 21 this year, Ms. Zhu of Hangzhou (a pseudonym ) Lost a one -carat diamond ring and a gold ring. Coincidentally, the two rings were picked up by Mr. Wang (a pseudonym), and he was surveillance to take the ring. Unexpectedly, this loss and picked up brought trouble to both parties.
The owner: You picked up the ring, or I would or lose my ring or lose my losses
Yesterday afternoon, the Shangcheng Court opened the trial of the case.
Ms. Zhu talked about the throwing diamond ring and choked a few times. She said that she was a gold ring and a diamond ring, which was of great significance to her. At more than 12 noon on the 21st, in order to wipe the hand cream, she took the two rings and put it on her body. At that time, she was sitting in the car. When she got out of the car, she forgot that the ring had not taken back, so after getting off the car, the ring fell in front of the cell one building.
Please click Enter the picture description
▲ The two rings wearing Ms. Zhu's hand
Buy 10,000. At about 1 pm, she found that the ring was lost and hurried back to find, but couldn't find it. After checking the monitoring, the police found that the two rings were picked up by Mr. Wang.
"When I know who found it, I still want to thank him well." Ms. Zhu said that what I didn't expect was that Mr. Wang only returned a gold ring and said that he thought that the diamond ring was fake. Later, I lost it at the door of the express company. "I won't look at my rings. Whoever believes that he believes that he will throw it away. Even the police say that everyone knows that he refuses to return it."
Ms. Zhu originally asked Wang Wang Wang Wang. Mr. Mr. Wang also repeatedly emphasized that the ring had been lost, and Ms. Zhu turned to ask Mr. Wang to compensate 77,000 yuan in losses. The case has also changed from the return of the original dispute to the dispute of property protection.
The person: I did n’t have the obligation to help you keep it. I think the ring is a cheap product
Mr. Wang naturally feels aggrieved. "Although I picked up the ring, I also have no obligation to help you help you help you help you help you help you. Keep it. "Mr. Wang said that he couldn't live in the community of Ms. Zhu. He just happened to go to the haircut. When he was waiting for a call, he saw two brilliant things on the ground.
"I picked it up, a yellow ring, a stainless steel ring, I think this diamond ring is like aluminum alloy with a small glass in the middle. The money of money, because it looks very cheap. So when I was sending a courier on the East Road of Huancheng in the evening, I took it out and threw it away. "Mr. Wang said.
Ms. Zhu asked him: "Why didn't you get the ring to the police room next to it? Since you feel worthless, why not throw it away on the spot?"
When the phone was called, I took it in hand without throwing it away on the spot. And I ca n’t live here, I do n’t know that there is a police room next to it. Later, he sent express, and he remembered the ring when he pulled his pocket. At the same time, Mr. Wang pointed out that he suspected that Ms. Zhu sued himself, which was a scam. "When they came to take the ring, there was no gratitude. Several people asked me where they came up, and where the other ring was. She always said that the ring was very valuable, but she hadn't found it herself. Once, it is not in line with common sense. I also helped her go back to find it a few times, but this is not my matter, why should I care so much? "
, Mr. Wang believes that Ms. Zhu only gave the ring that gave the ring’s ring. The sales order is not an invoice. This evidence does not have legal effect. Moreover, Ms. Zhu could not prove that the lost ring is the ring on the sales order. Mr. Wang said that he was also damaged by mental damage, and he reserved the right to counterclaim and pursuing mental loss.
Sub -then, Ms. Zhu took out a photo of her own diamond ring to prove that the loss of the diamond ring is the diamond ring pointed to the sales order. However, after looking at the photo, Mr. Wang said that on the ring he picked up, the glass did not exceed the below bracket, and the diamond on the photo was beyond the bracket, so he thought it was not the same ring.
Please click Enter the picture description
Lawyers: Those who pick up things need to have the obligation to guarantee, and deliberately throw away the corresponding responsibility
The lawyer Chen Shiyang of Zhongchen Law Firm in the south of Zhejiang pointed out that he is picking up After the loss of others, the person who picked up things had obligations. He gave things to the competent department. For example, taxi drivers handed the passengers to the transportation management department and completed their custody obligations.
If the person who picks up things to lose others, it depends on what causes the loss. If it is caused by intentional or major negligence, it is because the person who picks up things does not fulfill his obligation and needs to bear the corresponding responsibilities. Otherwise, there is no need to bear responsibility.
In this case, Mr. Wang also admitted that he had lost his ring. This belongs to the intentional loss of loss and did not fulfill the obligation of custody, so he needs to bear the corresponding compensation liability.
Is how much money Mr. Wang should compensate, which first requires the owner of Ms. Zhu to prove the value of the ring. "Ms. Zhu can take out the purchase voucher, invoice or the shopping list issued by the mall, or the records that can provide card transactions at that time, not necessarily the invoice." Secondly, Ms. Zhu needs to prove that she lost her own objects and lost her objects. It is the same as the objects on the purchase voucher. "In this case, Mr. Wang proposed that the loss of objects and the shopping list is not the same item, and it makes sense, so this evidence is difficult." Attorney Chen introduced that the evidence of both parties cannot prove 100%of their claims. Both parties also refuse to mediate. The court will judge according to "height", that is, the judge will make a judgment based on who is more credible to see who is more credible.
At the same time, Mr. Chen pointed out that if there is evidence to prove that the person who picks up things obviously keeps things, but he lies in the trial that things are lost. Fraud, the owner can report the case.
The trial lasted for more than two hours, and the judge did not pronounce in court.
The netizen comments
@ms горох: Oh my god, this world. Obviously, the lady lost her herself and wanted to pass the economic losses to others, and she made money! Intersection I want to know, shouldn't she bear what she lost? For those who do not know grateful, it deserves something to lose. In the future, I saw that others did n’t see it, and the thief looked at him. He was still not paying it back ~ If the man was convicted of the man to compensate, Lei Feng would become less and less in the future.
@mr. Xiaowe: It is best not to pick up things in the future, otherwise picking up a jar may be gold -plated, picking a toothpick may be ivory, and a glass ball may be crystal. The traffic police officer will say you are a fool, your brain is broken, throw it away, you may be sued in court for you to lose money. n@llily: It's also haha, this matter tells us a truth: Don't pick up the wild flowers on the roadside, don't pick it up on the roadside garbage.
@This year: What is wrong with picking things and stealing things in this society? If you are alive, you have to be careful. If one day I dropped downstairs through the flowers upstairs and smashed me. I had to blame my head and broke his pot?
@：: I think there are possibilities for scams.
@ms горох: If the man is sentenced to losing money, the hunch will be developed and expanded ~ a hawker (you can invoice), give yourself a sky -high invoice, throw things on the camera with a camera, In the place, fishing is fine. Are there any friends who fish together?
@: Now the glass ring of five dollars in the jewelry shop is really true. Anyway, I don't know the true or false. Last time my diamond ring was thrown in the unit, and my colleague thought it was fake, so I put it on the table. This lady should not blame others if she keeps it alone. Because there are more and more reports now, I dare not pick up when I see something outside, and I am afraid that I will take responsibility in the end. Last time I went out to play with my husband at night, and saw that there was a mobile phone on the roadside flower bed. I wanted to pick it up to see if I could find the owner. My husband said that there was a mobile phone that may be a scam. Essence
@: Other people have the obligation to keep things be kept? Do you have to pay? Then he didn't keep his own things, why not lose himself? Do you want to pay for others? If you picked it up, you are noble, and you do n’t pay attention to it. This woman is an unreasonable Lord at first glance. Whoever loses things is not considering unlucky, you can find it and thank you, you ca n’t find or blame others. You do n’t keep your own things. Why should others keep you? This woman must have a relationship! Now in this society, his mother's unreasonable place!
@草 ：: The owner wants money to crazy? Why do you make others take responsibility? It's ugly, don't you pick it up, right? It's funny ...
@ WeChat Super Member : ring: blame me!
@� � � � � � � � � � � � �, including garbage ... In case of story!
@ : What does this show this incident?
@仕-Huang Gang: Quoting the sentence of Secretary Sha: Do not let the honest people bleed and cry! Cold their hearts!
. If: Do n’t pick it up on the roadside people.
Please click Enter the picture description
Hmm
You picked up a prove that you were still a little bit commemorative to that thing. If you lost it, it also proves that you are a person who takes up!
It doesn't matter if you throw it, it is useless anyway.
Throw it and throw it. What does it mean to take it out?